Fix memory leak by adding "owner" concept of node

This commit is contained in:
Dominic Grimm 2023-08-05 12:52:28 +02:00
parent bdfc36ea3f
commit bb6c681780
3 changed files with 17 additions and 9 deletions

View file

@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ union hf__node_value {
struct hf__node {
enum hf__node_type type;
union hf__node_value value;
bool is_owner;
};
struct hf__parser {

View file

@ -7,6 +7,11 @@
void free_word_def_value(void *x) {
struct hf__interpreter__word *word = x;
for (size_t i = 0; i < word->body_len; i++) {
// TODO: free nodes
}
free(word->body);
free(word);
}
@ -54,17 +59,12 @@ struct hf__result words__word(struct hf__interpreter *const interpreter,
hf__parser__node_array_push(
&interpreter->call_stack, &interpreter->call_stack_len,
&interpreter->call_stack_size, (*word)->body[i]);
interpreter->call_stack[interpreter->call_stack_len - 1].is_owner = false;
}
/* FIXME: Word name points to copy of pointer of original name,
when cleared here all other references loose access to the pointer's value
=> SIGSEV!
For now I am going to ignore the memory leak.
Copying the word name may be a better option but is pretty memory
inefficient.
*/
// free(node->value.word.value);
if (node->is_owner) {
free(node->value.word.value);
}
return HF__OK;
}

View file

@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ struct hf__result hf__parse(struct hf__parser *const parser,
(struct hf__node){
.type = HF__NODE_TYPE__NUMBER,
.value = {.number = negative ? -number : number},
.is_owner = true,
});
break;
}
@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ struct hf__result hf__parse(struct hf__parser *const parser,
(struct hf__node){
.type = HF__NODE_TYPE__CHAR,
.value = {.ch = ch},
.is_owner = true,
});
break;
}
@ -218,6 +220,7 @@ struct hf__result hf__parse(struct hf__parser *const parser,
node = (struct hf__node){
.type = HF__NODE_TYPE__WORD,
.value = {.word = {.hash = hash, .value = lower_s}},
.is_owner = true,
};
} else {
node.type = **type_ptr;
@ -302,6 +305,7 @@ struct hf__result hf__parse(struct hf__parser *const parser,
(struct hf__node){
.type = HF__NODE_TYPE__WORD_DEF,
.value = {.word_def = word_def},
.is_owner = true,
});
break;
@ -323,6 +327,7 @@ struct hf__result hf__parse(struct hf__parser *const parser,
src, tokens[i].location.start,
tokens[i].location.end),
},
.is_owner = true,
});
break;
@ -336,6 +341,7 @@ struct hf__result hf__parse(struct hf__parser *const parser,
src, tokens[i].location.start,
tokens[i].location.end),
},
.is_owner = true,
});
break;
@ -349,6 +355,7 @@ struct hf__result hf__parse(struct hf__parser *const parser,
src, tokens[i].location.start,
tokens[i].location.end),
},
.is_owner = true,
});
break;